| Author |
Message |
Guardian
Site Admin


Joined: Jul 18, 2005
Posts: 308
|
Posted:
Sun Apr 08, 2007 3:10 pm |
|
I'm just wondering why eople don't read things.
I have modified my Your Accouny module to clearly identify which email addresses I will not allow registrations for and they still use them to try and register accounts.
Would be a neat trick to be able to redirect them back to the registration page with htaccess if the domain was in the url string lol. |
_________________ Spam Stopper - Comments Modules - Security News - Script Installer |
|
|
 |
Susann
Newbie


Joined: Jan 04, 2007
Posts: 55
Location: Cyberworld
|
Posted:
Mon Apr 09, 2007 7:40 am |
|
It´s the same with the rules.I´ve made my forum rules clear as daylight but the most user just don´t read. So I´have still to edit forums posts and deactivet accounts. |
| |
|
|
 |
montego
Site Admin/Owner


Joined: Feb 12, 2005
Posts: 952
|
Posted:
Mon Apr 09, 2007 9:23 am |
|
| Guardian wrote: |
| Would be a neat trick to be able to redirect them back to the registration page with htaccess if the domain was in the url string lol. |
Too bad its not in the URL string, but, instead, wrapped in a POST, right? Otherwise, it would be possible I think.
You could very easily do this in mainfile.php I think by cycling through the GET and POST variables... |
| |
|
|
 |
montego
Site Admin/Owner


Joined: Feb 12, 2005
Posts: 952
|
Posted:
Mon Apr 09, 2007 9:24 am |
|
Actually, not in mainfile.php as that would be executed every blasted time... |
| |
|
|
 |
socketus
Newbie


Joined: Apr 12, 2007
Posts: 1
|
Posted:
Thu Apr 12, 2007 5:36 pm |
|
yah, it would seem that quite a few forumgoers do not read. I do. Thats why its so frustrating to try to log in and read the referred links over at Raven's forums.
And I think I get why I cannot login and read the forums at Raven's - i'm not a current customer. Its annoying to be able to google or search his forums anonymously but to see the referred links and not to be able to see the forums after logging in ... grrrr ! |
| |
|
|
 |
Guardian
Site Admin


Joined: Jul 18, 2005
Posts: 308
|
Posted:
Thu Apr 12, 2007 6:10 pm |
|
|
|
 |
floppy
Newbie


Joined: Sep 11, 2006
Posts: 83
|
Posted:
Sun Apr 15, 2007 3:38 pm |
|
|
|
 |
floppy
Newbie


Joined: Sep 11, 2006
Posts: 83
|
Posted:
Sun Apr 15, 2007 3:42 pm |
|
On to guardian..
Couldn't you do something like this
Do that on the check you could easily use $_POST or $_GET there. |
_________________ http://www.t3gamingcommunity.com |
|
|
 |
montego
Site Admin/Owner


Joined: Feb 12, 2005
Posts: 952
|
Posted:
Mon Apr 16, 2007 7:56 am |
|
Well, that is PHP code and not .htaccess directives, but, yes, something like that would work just fine. Guardian was hoping to stop it within .htaccess, presumedly to avoid having to modify core PHP code.
However, I, myself, have been wondering if I shouldn't be "hooking" into nuke using the includes/custom_files more than I have, mainly the custom mainfile.php. This is possible you know...
In fact, it even gets included BEFORE NukeSentinel. |
| |
|
|
 |
floppy
Newbie


Joined: Sep 11, 2006
Posts: 83
|
Posted:
Mon Apr 16, 2007 9:17 am |
|
This is a little off subject, but it would be so nice if every file could have its own custom file. This would make upgrades so easy. |
_________________ http://www.t3gamingcommunity.com |
|
|
 |
Susann
Newbie


Joined: Jan 04, 2007
Posts: 55
Location: Cyberworld
|
Posted:
Tue Apr 17, 2007 8:08 pm |
|
Thanks floppy. I´ll check the download. |
| |
|
|
 |
Guardian
Site Admin


Joined: Jul 18, 2005
Posts: 308
|
Posted:
Mon Feb 11, 2008 7:15 pm |
|
| floppy wrote: |
| This is a little off subject, but it would be so nice if every file could have its own custom file. This would make upgrades so easy. |
I suppose it is do-able to an extent. You would just have to be very careful when creating a 'custom' file that it did not contain and replicated function names.
My first 'community' site used a perl script called WebAPP that had this exact same functionality. It made modifications really easy to maintain. |
_________________ Spam Stopper - Comments Modules - Security News - Script Installer |
|
|
 |
montego
Site Admin/Owner


Joined: Feb 12, 2005
Posts: 952
|
Posted:
Mon Feb 11, 2008 8:43 pm |
|
And in my mainframe days, I could point my JCL to a list of "libraries" and it would look in them in order, kind of like a PATH statement in a way.
Yes, I actually started my professional life on the mainframe with COBOL. Isn't that sad? I cut my teeth on a Commodore 64, graduated to a IBM PC Jr., then subsequent lines of 286 / 386 machines and then ended up professionally on a stupid mainframe... those were the "Dark Days". LOL! |
_________________ “To err is human, but when the eraser wears out ahead of the pencil, you’re overdoing it.”
-- Josh Jenkins |
|
|
 |
Guardian
Site Admin


Joined: Jul 18, 2005
Posts: 308
|
Posted:
Tue Feb 12, 2008 4:02 am |
|
Oh boy, COBOL and FORTRAN - now that brings back a few memories!!
I have almost lost track of my PC history, at least the precise timeline but it would be something like;
Commodore PET (screen and keyboard in one 'box'), Commodore 128, Commodore 64, Dragon 32 (I believe Tandy made something very similar called the TRS-80 ), the doomed Oracle 1, Atari 1500, I even had a Sinclair at one point.
I actually wrote some games for the Commodore 64 and Dragon 32 but nothing fancy, just 'Trivia' quiz type games to keep family and friends amused at dinner parties etc.
Then came 'proper' personal computers when my first purchase was HP P120 with an absolutely MASSIVE 1.2Gig hard drive and unbelievable 64Mb of on-board RAM.
Oops sorry, got carried away and went a little off-topic  |
_________________ Spam Stopper - Comments Modules - Security News - Script Installer |
|
|
 |
|
|